Canons 1385 and 1399 - On the Prohibition of Books

Kurgan must have missed Canons 1385 and 1399. They are the canons that deal with the publishing of books. They describe the topics that cannot be written about, and who must approve them (bold added):


Canon 1385


§ 1. Unless ecclesiastical censorship has preceded, there shall not be published, even by laity:


1. ° Books of sacred Scripture or annotations on them or commentaries;

2. ° Books that look to divine Scriptures, sacred theology, ecclesiastical history, canon law, natural theology, and ethics and other religious and moral disciplines of this sort; books and booklets of prayers, devotions, and teaching or religious instruction on morals, ascetics, mysticism and other [topics] of this sort, even though they seem conducive to fostering piety; and generally those writings in which there is something of special import to religion and right living;

3. ° Sacred images no matter how printed, whether they are published with prayers added or without them.

§ 2. Permission for publishing books and images mentioned in § 1 can be given by the Ordinary of the place of their author, or by the Ordinary of the place in which the books or images are going to be published, or by the Ordinary of the place in which they are printed,

although if one of the Ordinaries denied permission, the author cannot petition another unless he makes him aware of the denial of

permission from the other.



Canon 1399


By the law, [the following] are prohibited:


1. ° Original text editions or ancient versions of Catholic sacred Scripture, even of the Oriental Church, published by any non-

Catholic; and likewise versions [of these], in any language, by these [same sort] prepared or published;

2. ° Books of any writers propagating heresy or schism, or attacking in any way the basis of religion;

3. ° Books by design striking against religion and good morals;

4. ° Books by any non-Catholics treating purposely of religion, unless it can be shown that nothing contained in them is contrary to the Catholic faith;

5. ° Books mentioned in Canon 1385, § 1, n. 1, and Canon 1391; likewise all those mentioned in the cited Canon 1385, § 1, n. 2, [and] books and booklets that describe new apparitions, revelations, visions, prophecies, and miracles, or that lead to new devotions, even under the pretext of being private, if they have not been published in accord with the prescriptions of the canons;

6 . ° Books attacking or deriding any Catholic dogma, or protecting errors proscribed by the Holy See, or detracting from divine cult, or arguing for the avoidance of ecclesiastical discipline, or bringing about opprobrium on religion or the clerical state;

7. ° Books that teach or recommend superstition in general, sorcery, divination, magic, evoking of spirits, and other things of this sort;


So, the 1917 Code saw Kurgan coming from a mile away. No one is allowed to write books that look to (and interpret) Canon Law (Canon 1385), or bring about opprobrium (disgrace) to the CLERICAL STATE (Canon 1399). Kurgan’s sedevacantist theory attempts to bring disgrace to almost all the clergy! 


NOT ALLOWED


That’s unless he got permission from his local Bishop, which is obvious he did not. I’m just pointing out that kurgan “love” of the 1917 Code does not go passed the very limited canons that has read, and that he misinterprets to suggest his heretical views.


Who approved your books Kurgan?

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Kurgan promotes Lust and Masturbation

Image
The Kurgan is now promoting lust and masturbation as a path to martial bliss.  To set the table, let's take a look at the official Catholic definitions of "Lust" and "Mastubation" LUST - A disordered desire for or inordinate enjoyment of sexual pleasure. Sexual pleasure is morally disordered when sought for itself, isolated from its procreative and unitive purposes. Source - Catechism of the Catholic Church 1992 - #2351 MASTURBATION - The deliberate stimulation of the genital organs in order to derive sexual pleasure. Masturbation is an intrinsically and gravely disordered action. The deliberate use of the sexual faculty, for whatever reason, outside of marriage is essentially contrary to it's purpose. Source - CCC - #2351 And we also see by the sin of Onan, who God slew, God does not approve of contraception, which Onan was guilty of by "pulling out" and wasting his seed on the ground. Source - https://www.catholic.com/magazine/print-edition/the-s...
Read more

Pope Francis says that all religions lead to God, and he is absolutely correct.

Image
Before all of you "trad" and "faithful" christians or catholics get your shorts in a bunch and start in with the rash judgement, let's take a deep breath..... Breath in....... Hold,,,,,, Breath out.        Breath in........Hold........Breath out...... OK. Now that we have relaxed our muscles and a we have a brain full of oxygen, let's discuss. The article is here: https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/breaking-pope-francis-every-religion-is-a-way-to-arrive-at-god/ Now, let's break down the article, and analyze what is said and the context in which it was said. " Pope Francis today told young people of different faiths that “every religion is a way to arrive at God.” Addressing an inter-religious meeting of young people in Singapore just before departing for his return flight to Rome, Pope Francis turned to one of the central themes of his pontificate – inter-religious dialogue." So far, so good. The Pope is speaking to a group of young people of di...
Read more

Three Marriages, No Annulments — The Domestic Contradiction of The Kurgan

“Let marriage be held in honor among all, and let the marriage bed be undefiled.” — Hebrews 13:4 The Kurgan never misses a chance to attack others for their failings, especially in matters of faith. He’s the first to declare someone “not a real Catholic,” denounce “fake clergy,” or assign people to the flames for liturgical imperfection. But when it comes to his own life , a strange silence takes hold. Or worse—an open contradiction. In his latest blog post, “The Cowards,” he casually admits: “I made plenty of errors too. Twice divorced and many women in between. BUT… I am now happily married with a sixth kid on the way.” The problem? He has never mentioned a single annulment . And as far as anyone can tell, he doesn’t recognize any ecclesiastical authority capable of granting one. After all, in his view, the Church has been “fake” since 1958. Which means this supposed champion of tradition and canon law is—by his own admission— on his third marriage, with no canonical process, n...
Read more