Canon 188.4 and Clerical State - 12 reasons why kurgan is wrong



The Council of Trent's "anathema" statements show us that canon 188.4 has NOTHING to do with a loss of clerical state. Once a priest, always a priest. Kurgan has avoided two simple yes/no questions that I have repeatedly asked him that prove this. So, to prove my position beyond the shadow of a doubt, I will add ten more questions to those for the kurgan to answer:


YES or NO?


1 - Upon ordination, is a character imprinted on the priest/Bishop?

2 - Can an ordained priest ever become a layman?

3 - Is ordination a true sacrament, instituted by Jesus Christ Himself?

4 - is ordination just a human invention, with no divine properties?

5 - Is the Holy Spirit given to the Bishop at ordination?

6 - When the bishop says to a priest during ordination, “Receive the Holy Spirit”, does the priest actually receive the Holy Spirit?

7 - Can sacred ordination ever be invalidated?

8 - Are priests whose lives have been debased by crime still within the Church?

9 - Does a bishop or priest whose life has been debased by crime lose their sacramental power?

10 - Can excommunicated Bishops validly ordain other bishops and priests?

11 - Can a laicized priest still hear a sacramental confession in an emergency, and confer other sacraments validly?

12 - Can a priest ever resign from the priesthood?


The answers of the Magisterium of the Catholic Church are as follows:


1 - YES

2 - NO

3 - YES

4 - NO

5 - YES

6 - YES

7 - NO

8 - YES

9 - NO

10 - YES

11 - YES

12 - NO


So, what are your answers kurgan? Are you ready to admit that a priest can never lose the clerical state, and always has the ability to validly (but not licitly) perform the sacraments? 

I expect nothing but silence or name calling. You are defeated.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Kurgan promotes Lust and Masturbation

Pope Francis says that all religions lead to God, and he is absolutely correct.

Three Marriages, No Annulments — The Domestic Contradiction of The Kurgan