Kurgan's Calender of Absolute Certainty
Kurgan’s Calendar of Absolute Certainty
The one thing we can be absolutely certain about… is that Kurgan is absolutely certain that almost none of the current "clergy" (myself included) have been validly ordained. According to him, we have all apostatized from the faith and are not only not clergy, but not even Catholic.
And Kurgan is so absolutely certain, he even knows the exact date it all happened.
Let’s take a look at what he says in his book Reclaiming the Catholic Church (RTCC), page 36
(My comments in RED, my emphasis in BOLD):
“In summary then, I have made the bold claim here that I will prove beyond a doubt that the Catholic Church was infiltrated, and that those infiltrators took over the Papacy as imposters from 28th October 1958 on and that, the Catholic Church has not had a valid Pope since then.”
Excellent! Kurgan promises to prove this specific date beyond a doubt. We’re in good hands.
But reading further (RTCC, pp. 36–37):
“To be absolutely precise, however, I will state that even if any kind of doubt, of whatever flimsy nature, might be cast upon the date of 28th October 1958, we can conclude with absolute certainty that the Catholic Church has not had a valid Pope since, at the most charitable in the extreme, the precise date of June 8th, 1966, which is six months after the last document of Vatican II was published (December 7th 1965)."
So, if you're not absolutely certain about October 28, 1958, don’t worry—you can instead be absolutely certain about June 8, 1966. Let’s continue.
RTCC, page 37:
“In fact, it would be a duty of any cleric of the Catholic Church to have pronounced the Vatican II documents starting with the very first ones published as heresy.
Given that the first two documents were published on the 4th of December 1963, even if you try to cast some doubt on the Roncalli ‘Papacy’ (as we will see in Chapter III there is no doubt, the man was a heretic and invalidly elected too), we could correctly state that there has been no valid Pope in the Holy See from the date of 4th December 1963 onward.”
Ah, good! If you're unsure about the 1958 or 1966 dates, you can still be certain about 1963.
But there’s more:
“Even if you were to apply the rule that there needs to be a six-month period for a heretic to repent, which would be unreasonable to do at least for the Fake Pope Montini, because, as already stated, it does not apply in the case of those who publicly defect from the Catholic Faith… it would still mean that in reality, the formal date for the apostasy of all the clerics of the Church who did not denounce Vatican II as heresy is really the 5th of June 1964… Meaning that after the 5th of June 1964, any cleric who did not denounce Vatican II in any way, also defected from the Faith and as such became a heretic.”
Ah yes, if you're applying the "six-month rule" (I assume he's referring to Canon 2315), then you can be absolutely certain that the correct date is June 5, 1964.
Summary:
According to Reclaiming the Catholic Church, we can be absolutely certain that the apostasy occurred on:
-
28 October 1958, or
-
4 December 1963, or
-
5 June 1964, or
-
8 June 1966
So depending on your research, feelings, mood, or planetary alignment, you may pick whichever date is—in your opinion—absolutely certain.
Just remember, no interpretation of the law is required. Everything Kurgan says is simple, obvious, and absolutely clear.
Of that, we can be absolutely certain.
Comments
Post a Comment