The "Absolute Certainty" of the Kurgan

 The one thing that we can be absolutely certain about, is that kurgan is absolutely certain of his view that almost none of the current "clergy" (including myself) have been validly ordained. We have all apostatized from the faith, and are not only not clergy, but not even Catholic!  Kurgan is so absolutely certain, that he knows, beyond a doubt, the exact date:

From his book reclaiming the Catholic Church (RTCC) page 36 (my comments in RED, my emphasis in BOLD)

“In summary then, I have made the bold claim that here that I will prove beyond a doubt that the Catholic Church was infiltrated, and that those infiltrators took over the Papacy as imposters from 28th October 1958 on and that, the Catholic Church has not had a valid Pope since then.”

Great! Kurgan is going to prove this date of 28 October 1958 beyond a doubt, with absolute certainty.


Reading Further (RTCC pages 36 - 37):


“To be absolutely precise, however, I will state that even if any kind of doubt, of whatever flimsy  nature, might be cast upon the date of 28th October 1958, we can conclude with absolute certainty that the Catholic Church has not had a valid Pope since, at the most charitable in the extreme, the precise date of June 8th, 1966, which is six months after the last document of Vatican II was published (December 7th 1965)."

So, this is good to know! if you happen to have a doubt about the date of 28 October 1958, you can be "absolutely certain" that the date is June 8 1966. Let's read on..


RTCC page 37


“In fact, it would be a duty of any cleric of the Catholic Church to have pronounced the Vatican II documents starting with the very first ones published as heresy.

Given that the first two documents were published on the 4th of December 1963, even if you try to cast some doubt on the Roncalli “Papacy” (as we will see in Chapter III there is no doubt, the man was a heretic and invalidly elected too) we could correctly state that there has been no valid Pope in the Holy See from the date of 4th December 1963 onward.”

To further "clarify", in case you don't think that the date was 28 October 1958, or you're not absolutely certain the date was June 8 1966, you can correctly state, with absolute certianty, that the date of apostacy was 4 December 1963. Reading further...


“Even if you were to apply the rule that there needs to be a six month period for a genetic to repent, which would be unreasonable to do at least for the Fake Pope Montini, because, as already stated, it does not apply in the case of those who publicly defect from the Catholic Faith, which is hard to make more public than by publishing heretical writings for the entire world, it would still mean that in reality, the formal date for the apostasy of all the clerics of the Church who did not denounce Vatican II as heresy is really the 5th of June 1964. That’s because all of those clerics would indeed be suspected of heresy for not denouncing the fake Pope who publicly defects from Catholicism. And by their silence, they too would be publicly defected from the Faith, and decidedly so if they kept quiet for the entire six month period. Meaning that after the 5th of June 1964, any cleric who did not denounce Vatican II in any way, also defected from the Faith and as such became a heretic.'

So if you apply the "6 month rule" (I assume kurgan is talking about Canon 2315), you can be "absolutely certain" that the date of apostacy was 5 June 1964.


My Summary

As we see in these quotes from his book, Kurgan is absolutely certain that almost all clergy has apostatized from the Catholic faith. He is "absolutely certain" that it happened on:


28 October 1958, or

8 June 1966, or

4 December 1963, or 

5 June 1964


So, depending upon your own research and thoughts,  you can pick which ever date, that, in your opinion, is absolutely correct. You can be "absolutely certain", though, that it is one of these four days. 

 Remember,  no interpretation of the law is necessary. Everything the kurgan states is simple and obvious. Of that, we can be absolutely certain.


 




Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Pope Francis says that all religions lead to God, and he is absolutely correct.

Image
Before all of you "trad" and "faithful" christians or catholics get your shorts in a bunch and start in with the rash judgement, let's take a deep breath..... Breath in....... Hold,,,,,, Breath out.        Breath in........Hold........Breath out...... OK. Now that we have relaxed our muscles and a we have a brain full of oxygen, let's discuss. The article is here: https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/breaking-pope-francis-every-religion-is-a-way-to-arrive-at-god/ Now, let's break down the article, and analyze what is said and the context in which it was said. " Pope Francis today told young people of different faiths that “every religion is a way to arrive at God.” Addressing an inter-religious meeting of young people in Singapore just before departing for his return flight to Rome, Pope Francis turned to one of the central themes of his pontificate – inter-religious dialogue." So far, so good. The Pope is speaking to a group of young people of di...
Read more

Three Marriages, No Annulments — The Domestic Contradiction of The Kurgan

“Let marriage be held in honor among all, and let the marriage bed be undefiled.” — Hebrews 13:4 The Kurgan never misses a chance to attack others for their failings, especially in matters of faith. He’s the first to declare someone “not a real Catholic,” denounce “fake clergy,” or assign people to the flames for liturgical imperfection. But when it comes to his own life , a strange silence takes hold. Or worse—an open contradiction. In his latest blog post, “The Cowards,” he casually admits: “I made plenty of errors too. Twice divorced and many women in between. BUT… I am now happily married with a sixth kid on the way.” The problem? He has never mentioned a single annulment . And as far as anyone can tell, he doesn’t recognize any ecclesiastical authority capable of granting one. After all, in his view, the Church has been “fake” since 1958. Which means this supposed champion of tradition and canon law is—by his own admission— on his third marriage, with no canonical process, n...
Read more

The Death of a Pope, and the Death of a Book.

A Certain Book has Just Expired Reclaiming the Catholic Church… from the Past When The self-published book  Reclaiming the Catholic Church  was released in 2020, the kurgan framed it as a theological nuke: an unanswerable, bulletproof exposé proving once and for all that Pope Francis was a fraud, the hierarchy was corrupt, and only sedevacantists could be real Catholics. But as of this week, there’s one tiny problem: Pope Francis is dead. And with him, so is the central premise of Kurgan’s entire book. We’re now left with a text that’s not just polemical — it’s obsolete . The book hinges on a very specific historical snapshot: “Francis is the problem, and we must resist him now.” Well, time marched on. The problem is gone. And resistance to a corpse is hardly heroic. It’s like writing a fire evacuation manual… for a building that already burned down. What Happens When Your Theology Ages Like Milk? Books survive if they’re grounded in truth, or timeless principle. Kurgan’s boo...
Read more